People who believe that if VAR had existed in the past, a lot of wins and losses would have turned…
انتشار: 2026/07/12 05:59 UTC
People who believe that if VAR had existed in the past, a lot of wins and losses would have turned out differently.I mostly disagree.It's like a college exam. If a few chapters are removed, new subjects are added, it doesn't really affect the students who are capable of finishing at the top. They adapt to the new rules.The same applies to soccer. In the past, deceiving the referee was considered part of a player's skill set. Since players devoted some of their mental focus and energy to fooling the referee, that came at the expense of other aspects of their game. Today, they know it's almost impossible to get away with it because VAR allows officials to review plays and overturn decisions. As a result, players adapt and focus more on playing the game rather than trying to deceive the referee.افرادی که باور دارند که اگر var نبود در گذشته خیلی از بردها و باختها عوض می شد. من تقریبا مخالفم. مانند کنکوره. چند فصل حذف بشه و چند درس اضافه بشه یا ضریب یک درس زیاد یا کم بشه. نقشی در اونی که میخواد رتبه برتر کنکور بشه نداره چون خودشو وفق میده.در گذشته مهارت فریب داور جزو مهارتهای فوتبالیست شدن بود و چون بازیکنان ۵ درصد انرژی و فکر خود را به فریب داور صرف می کنند، بخش های دیگر بازی شان کمی افت می کرد و الان می دانند هیچ جوره نمیشه داور را فریب داد، چون امکان بازبینی و تغییر رای است.


